
Yawn, it's old news already.
But it sure drives up the traffic!
Hi Ya’ll,
(yup, been in Missouri too long) I wanted to send you a picture of our newest arrival here on Haven Lee Farm. Isn’t she a beauty. Her name is Haven Lee’s Sweet Surprise. And she was most definitely one.
Dad woke us up so we could share in the excitement.
Jaycee is doing well in school! She likes taking tests, well most of the time. I am enjoying school tremendously. The classes are fun and exciting; kind of like CSI on TV, but much much better.
Anyway I hope you all have fun and enjoy the summer. Talk to you, hopefully, soon.
Steph
A problem power plant south of Kansas City that has caused considerable controversy might be spared by the legislature. The House has voted in favor of Aquila even though the representatives closest to that plant urge it not to.As I read this, and correct me if I am wrong, please, a big utility company called Aquila, starts building a big power plant in Cass County without permission. The courts tell the company to stop building the plant until they get permission. The courts had to tell Aquila twice to stop building the plant. Aquila, the utility company, ignored the court rulings and continues to build the plant. When they got caught and it came time for Aquila to face the music, they had to come clear to Willard before they could find someone who would sponsor a "get out of jail free" bill** that would let them go against two court orders and continue to operate the plant.
Aquila, the Kansas City utility, built a $140 million power plant near Peculiar in 2005 without getting approval from Cass County. The State Public Service Commission approved construction a year later, but the courts ruled that came too late and that the plant must come down. The House has given preliminary approval to a bill that effectively overrules that court decision.
Rep. Luke Scavuzzo (D-Harrisonville) argued during House floor debate that Aquila doesn't deserve the break, "because I do not feel they have been forthright with the people of my district, the citizens of Peculiar and the people of Cass County."
Scavuzzo lives in the district as does Rep. Brian Baker (R-Belton). Baker pointed out during floor debate that Aquila lost this battle in the courts twice. He said the proposal tells those who filed suit against the utility and won that the rule of law doesn't matter.
Two other state representatives have a piece of Cass County in their district. Rep. Mike McGhee (R-Odessa) also voted against the measure. McGhee represents a sliver of the county. Rep. Shannon Cooper (R-Clinton)* represents the southern portion of Cass County. Cooper voted in favor, reasoning that it doesn't make sense to tear down a power plant already in production.
That was the argument of Rep. Shane Schoeller (R-Willard) who sponsored the portion of HCS HB 2279 dealing with the Aquila plant. Schoeller told colleagues the court order to tear down a plant fully in operation doesn't make sense.
"That's not the common sense that I know that comes from Missouri," Schoeller told the House.
That portion of the bill passed on an 88-49 vote. The entire bill is poised for final passage. It then would go to the Senate for its consideration.
Schoeller said Aquila thought it was on sound legal ground to build the plant, despite the court injunction barring its construction. Aquila regretted its decision to build the plant without state or local approval and had tried to make amends with local officials and nearby landowners, he said.
We appreciate the sentiment that lead to the decision to build sidewalks in the 1600 blocks of South Ferguson, South New and South Weaver. However, as residents who live on these streets, we believe that the money expended for this effort would be better spent if it were allocated to the Police and Fireman’s Pension Fund. If that is not possible, we would suggest that the money be spent on sidewalk improvements to South Fort Street and South Campbell Street as identified on page 25 of the Fassnight Neighborhood Assessment Report, accepted by the Springfield City Council on October 18, 2004: “Increase pedestrian safety on sidewalks located along S. Campbell Avenue and S. Fort Avenue by realigning them so they are separated from the street by a grassy parkway.”Today, the dig rite people were repainting the street and curbs and right of way with purple and yellow spray paint and placing the little flags. As I got ready to take photos of the little flags and lament what we in the neighborhood thought was the coming of the sidewalks, Doug Thomas, a Senior Engineering Technician with the Department of Public Works came by and told me the sidewalks were being moved to Stanford Avenue, between Portland School and Grant or Campbell.
A Republican state lawmaker will present legislation tomorrow to a House committee to repeal the state's 10 percent ethanol mandate.
While a study is of a study paid for by the Missouri Corn Merchandising Council claiming that the fuel will save the state millions of dollars, state Rep. Mike Dethrow, R-Alton, says that the mandate is causing unintended consequences.
Dethrow, who operated a livestock farming business for year in rural Oregon County, said today that the mandate is driving up cost of feed. That means a "meltdown" for farmers raising livestock.
Even though he voted for the mandate a couple of years ago, Dethrow said that changes in the agricultural economy warrant another look.
“Two years ago when we voted to implement the ten-percent standard — and I voted for it at the time — but things do change," Dethrow said. "And the situation’s been changed. We want to make sure that we’re still doing the right thing. I’m concerned that a mandate is not the right thing to do. I’m concerned that it has distorted markets in other areas in the feed grains and those issues.”
Similar charges were made when the Missouri Senate approved a five percent mandate of biodiesel - which is made with soybeans.
Dethrow's legislation will be heard tomorrow at 8 a.m. in front of the House Transportation Committee. Even if it manages to pass through the legislature, it would likely face scrutiny from Gov. Matt Blunt. Blunt signed the E-10 standard into law and has touted the move as one of the key accomplishments of his term.
Rev. Wright made his living on spouting hate-filled words at a nation that has allowed him to live better than 99 percent of the rest of the world. Sheriff Jack Merritt, on the other hand, has spent his life putting himself in harm's way to protect people, even those who spew distasteful speech.Do I detect a 'tinge' of racism in that statement? I like Jason Wert's question: Steve, is it the position of the Metro Republicans and the Greene County [Circuit] Clerk's office that what Sheriff Merritt said was acceptable speech in today's environment?