
I've been busy
Democrat Scott Eckersley and Libertarian Kevin Craig have accepted KOLR/KSFX's proposal for a 7th District debate. As of 5:30 p.m. Wednesday, our newsroom has not received official word from Republican Billy Long's campaign.From firedupmissouri.com:
Billy Long's Handlers Fed Up With Debates Agreed To By Billy Long's Handlers
KOLR/KSFX has a fascinating story out of the 7th District about the Billy Long's willingness to debate debating -- but unwillingness to actually engaging in actual debates. Long apparently isn't even allowed to discuss the idea of debates with Scott Eckersley on camera -- consultant James Harris has kept those responsibilities to himself.*
Remember as you watch this clip that Billy Long's campaign agreed to the debates Harris now says are "some type of media gimmick"
(Springfield, MO) -- When it comes to the 7th U.S. Congressional District race, the only real debate we're seeing is when and where to debate.Has anyone else noticed that whenever Billy Long gets cornered, he trots out Nancy Pelosi? Is he in love with her or what?*
And there are only 70 days until Election Day, so time's running out.
At first, Republican Billy Long appeared to accept Democrat Scott Eckersley's invitation to debate on the courthouse steps in every county in the district.
Eventually, Long backed out, disagreeing with the format. With time ticking away, there's still no debate -- yet.
Throughout history, political debates have resulted in the most memorable moments of all time.
But when it comes to 7th U.S. Congressional District voters making a choice, they want to hear from the candidates.
"If you have a debate, they have to say what they're thinking about at the time of the debate," says voter Toni Storch.
"Billy Long has made it very clear that we're very open to discuss debates," says Long spokesman James Harris.
"It's obviously clear that there's one candidate in this race who wants to discuss what's important to folks, and who wants to learn and listen and there's one who doesn't," says Eckersley.
But will it happen? Will Republican Billy Long and Democrat Scott Eckersley go at it?
"Meeting at noon at the courthouse steps really doesn't work for many voters here in Southwest Missouri," says Harris. "People are working, taking care of their families, in school."
"If they're on the courthouse steps, I want to be there," one voter tells KOLR/KSFX.
Be it radio, television, newspaper -- the two claim they're ready to talk. They just can't agree on how to talk.
"What we're not going to participate in is some type of media gimmick," says Harris.
"I'll go so far as to say my opponent is a gimmick," says Eckersley.
Regardless of whether they debate long distance --
"I put most everything I had into this race because I didn't want to depend on special interest dollars like my opponent," says Eckersley.
-- or face to face --
"Scott Eckersley will be a rubber stamp for Nancy Pelosi," says Harris.
-- on Election Day, the voice that speaks the loudest will be the voters.
"If you're not ready to step into the fire, you'd better step out," says a voter.
For the record, KOLR/KSFX talked to Libertarian candidate Kevin Craig Tuesday. He says if Long and Eckersley decide on a debate, he'd be happy to be a part of it.
To all of the campaigns, KOLR/KSFX extends this offer: call our newsroom at (417) 862-6397. We will sponsor a debate in our studios.
To our viewers, stay tuned. We will tell you Tuesday on KOLR10 News at Six whether the candidates are willing to debate.
More than five years have passed since the death of Terri Schiavo, the reportedly quiet and shy Pennsylvania girl, who those five years ago was the center of worldwide attention, as her husband Michael—the first man Terri ever kissed—finally succeeded in allowing her to pass away with not much dignity to spare.
The president of the Missouri Republican Assembly for the 7th District criticized former GOP congressional candidate Michael Wardell on Tuesday for his support of Democrat Scott Eckersley over Republican Billy Long.I was at that press conference. Magill was combative and very aggressive* in directing his statements towards Wardell. Learning that the event in question was on the internets, I drove the bus down the series of interconnected tubes and listened to the podcast. Magill's criticism of Wardell is weakened considerably when one listens to the podcast.
At a news conference at which Wardell announced his support, Dr. Scott Magill reminded Wardell that he and the other Republican candidates had pledged to support the winner of the GOP primary at a debate hosted by the Missouri Republican Assembly.
"How do you justify -- change -- a willingness to neglect that pledge and say it was of no importance?" asked Magill.
Magill said he, like Wardell, had served in the Marines, and he held "very sacred" a man's integrity.
Wardell said he could not remember the exact phraseology of what he had pledged at the forum.
"I don't think I would have made that promise," he told Magill. "However, if I did, then I completely apologize for breaking my word."
A couple of things I would like to do before we ask the first question.Magill's disjointed remarks are par for the course and seem to follow the Michael Feldman five disclaimers school of reasoning by using poorly worded, ambiguous statements.
First of all we are all family, we have discussions, we have disagreements in family, but we are still family and I think it is important that we understand that and we
I am going to ask each of the candidates to agree to two issues.
First of all, as family, I would like, in order, if everybody would agree to support the will of the voter, and to continue to support the Republican party, the platform and the constitution regardless of the outcome of the primary.
(everyone present agrees to the statement)
The next thing, I, and this is not a surprise, except uh, anybody potentially Mr. Moore and I sure he’s all right with that, uh,
As a family and as a Missouri Republican Assembly I have, I think that it is important all of these gentlemen bring a lot to the table, they bring a lot to the discussion and the worst thing that could ever happen would be to have six at the table now out of the picture after the primary.
So the 7th District Chapter of the Missouri Republican Assembly has, as of today, established a new action group, which is presently chaired by City Councilman Nick Ibarra and this action group will be composed of those who do not come out victorious of the primary.
And their purpose is to stay actively involved with the congressman when he is elected, and to pat him of the back and support him.
And they can pat him on the back with their hand or their foot.
But it is important to have support group that is in communication to make sure that whoever is in that office is indeed abiding by the constitution, by the Republican platform and representing their constituents back at home.
And I can think of no finer group to do that then the people you see at this table in front of you.
Anonymous said...Quit speculating people. You know nothing that you speak of. I know for a fact that Jeff wrote the press release himself, but the amazing part is what is not being said about it. Eckersly used Jeff's name without his permission when Jeff has pointed out numerous times that he would not endorse Billy until he approached him as is tradition. Jeff heard what Billy had to say and decided all on his own that he would support him. That's the story plain and simple kiddos, so those of you commenting about other things please leave your conspiracy theories in your head. August 22, 2010 1:53 AMThen, maybe he got a couple of hours sleep, I don't know but I do know he read the paper, online, replying to a comment I made on this story: Writing as "Ozarkallmylife",
Jim don't always believe what you read is correct. A friend of mine that knows Jeff very well explained it to me this way....Ms. DeVera did not understood what Jeff was trying to communicate to her or he misunderstood her question. He assumed she was asking was he prepared to endorse Billy at that exact moment and if that was why he showed up to the opening of the Republican HQ. He wasn't prepared to endorse him at that moment because Billy had not asked for it. Jeff would not want an endorsement he didn't seek so he put word out to Billy's people that if they wanted it he wanted to talk with Billy and that they would ask for it. However he did tell Ms. DeVera that he was supporting the GOP nominee...big difference between supporting and endorsing. He kept his pledge so stop spouting without knowing the whole situation please. 8/22/2010 4:29:22 AMThen the commentator caught an early bus and left this comment:
Anonymous said...Jeff did not say he wasn't endorsing Billy. Just because the SNL says it doesn't mean it is unequivocally true. Why don't you try calling Jeff Wisdom and asking him before writing about how he said one thing and did another...be responsible in your writing and only then will you be taken seriously. 8/22/2010 4:48 AMThen, apparently he transferred to another route and deposited this comment:
Anonymous said...Wrong again...Duane Graham is far from being a Republican. Erstwhile Conservative is his blog Erstwhile=Former. 8/22/2010 4:51 AMIn fairness to Graham, I did go back and edit that post, changing his status from "republican" to "former conservative Republican".
Springfield, MO 19th August 2010: Mr. Long confirmed today he is backing out of the previously accepted Courthouse Debate Series extended to the Long campaign on August 4th. They were concerned about coverage of the debates, and argued that the pre-primary candidate forums qualified as debates.Long, who campaigned as a outsider 'fed up' with career politicians, spent the day at the Missouri State Fair and apparently was not at the meeting. Instead he tweets that he was at a press conference at the fair with "Roy, Blaine and Vicky" all of whom fit the description of "Career Politicians."
“For someone who says he’s ‘Fed Up’ with politics and touts himself as an ‘outsider’ these stalling and misleading tactics tell a very different story.” Said Eckersley, “There’s never been a more important time for the people of Southwest Missouri to really get to know the person who wants to represent them. The people don’t want to gamble on the party label - they’re looking at the person. They want someone with the courage and conviction to stand up and fight for their interests in Washington. I’m going to keep talking to the communities of Southwest Missouri and prove to them I’m that guy. When Mr. Long gets back in the district and wants to get to work, he knows where to find me.”
The Eckersley campaign will move forward with the scheduling events. Mr. Long was invited to reconsider his decision not to debate, and meet Eckersley at any point along the tour.
The Blunt family is now basically a lobbying firm - sons, wife, Roy himself is a great lobbyist for the insurance, drug, banking industries . . . and, his most famous earmark, a rider to help his wife's big tobacco lobbying firm that he attached to the Homeland Security Bill in the wee hours. Even his GOP counterparts thought that was inappropriate, and it cost him his leadership position and gave us all John Boehner. And let's not forget Roy's hard work on behalf of Jack Abromoff's Indian casinos in Mississippi - he actually sent threatening letters to the Department of Interior on buddy Jack's behalf. But that's Roy for you . . . always thinking of ways to help his loyal constituents here in God's Country.
This is typical 'Blunt" speak. Now traveling on the Republican Chamber of Commerce dime. He's saying forget what I did for 14 years, and my voting and lobbying against the middle-class. Just trust me because my opponent is a Democrat.
The 'plan' - Extend the wealthy tax cut, DON'T regulate Wall Street, let big corporate and special interest send more jobs overseas, while repealing health care reform, Social Security, Medicare as soon as I get ANOTHER 3.6 million from banking, securities, and other special interest, I'll find jobs for Missouri.
Since early this year, Billy Long has run from gambling accusations. He has gone as far as telling key supporters he never stepped foot in a casino according to some sources. He's fought against the gambling accusations despite his name being on several high-stakes games hosted by the World Poker Tour and other tournament organizers claiming his opponents started a "whisper campaign" against him.He Shoulda gone to Disneyland.
So what does Billy Long do after denying these claims and alluding to them as smears? Well he does what any addicted gambler would do. He runs off to Las Vegas immediately after winning the Republican primary.
This sounds more like the Barnum and Bailey circus than it does any kind of legitmate new political establishment. Long will prove he is a political clown, ineffective because he is in this for himself and not the people of Southwest Missouri. He lacks the political knowledge he needs to be effective, and he will be controlled easily. Perhaps that's why some in the party celebrate.